Skip to content

Port Authority Will Widen Bike Pinch Points Around GWB Towers

The Port Authority announced plans yesterday to add some breathing room for biking and walking around the towers on the George Washington Bridge. Currently the paths narrow and jog around the towers at tight angles -- the new "wedges" will make for a more comfortable ride.
Port Authority Will Widen Bike Pinch Points Around GWB Towers
The Port Authority is adding "wedges" (in blue) to make room for cyclists around the George Washington Bridge's towers. Image: PANYNJ

The Port Authority announced plans yesterday to add some breathing room for biking and walking around the towers on the George Washington Bridge [PDF]. Currently the paths narrow and jog around the towers at tight angles — the new “wedges” will make for a more comfortable ride.

But the Port’s $1.8 billion bridge renovation, set to break ground later this year, won’t otherwise widen the paths, which fall short of engineering standards for two-way bike lanes.

The wedges around the towers will “allow the cyclists to traverse the towers without having to dismount,” Port official Libby McCarthy told board members yesterday.

Yesterday’s announcement comes after 252 people contacted the Port with concerns about the bridge paths. Last week, biking advocacy organizations on both sides of the Hudson sent a letter to Port leadership specifically requesting wider paths around the towers.

At the request of Transportation Alternatives and the New Jersey Bike & Walk Coalition, the Port Authority released a plan in 2014 to route pedestrians and cyclists onto separate sides of the bridge (walkers on the south side, cyclists on the north), replace the north path stairs with ramps, and eliminate a hairpin turn on the south path. The advocates also won continuous pedestrian and bike access throughout the construction period, expected to last seven years.

The updated plan still falls short of the “Complete George” proposal put forward by Neile Weissman, who has called on the Port to add wider paths for bike traffic that would run parallel to the current paths. If the paths aren’t widened, Weissman warns, the bridge won’t be able to accommodate the growing number of people who bike across the bridge, especially on weekends.

Photo of David Meyer
David was Streetsblog's do-it-all New York City beat reporter from 2015 to 2019. He returned as an editor in 2023 after a three-year stint at the New York Post.

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Opinion: Sean Duffy’s ‘Golden Age’ of Dangerous Streets

Ethan Andersen
December 15, 2025

‘I’m Always on the Bus’: How Transit Advocacy Helped Katie Wilson Become Seattle’s Next Mayor

December 12, 2025

Watchdog Wants Hochul To Nix Bus Lane Enforcement Freebies for MTA Drivers

December 11, 2025

More Truck Routes Are Coming To A Street Near You

December 11, 2025

Upstate County’s New Bus Service Will Turn A Transit Desert Into A Rural Network

December 11, 2025
See all posts