Skip to content

It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign

Bill Shuster, the leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn't expire for several years. Advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.
It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign

Taking a cue from Donald Trump, the leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn’t expire for several years.

Last week committee chair Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican, kicked off a campaign called “Building a 21st Century Infrastructure” with a hearing featuring testimony from freight shippers, carmakers, equipment manufacturers, and other interests that reap rewards from more road spending.

The campaign is still in the hype phase. We know that the highway building industry is excited, but no specific policy proposal has been announced. So far what Shuster’s committee has released is a list of vague “principles”:

  • Make smart investments, consistent with the fundamental federal role, to ensure a modern, efficient U.S. transportation infrastructure.
  • Leverage resources from all levels of government and the private sector.
  • Recognize, promote, and develop integrated transportation systems.
  • Empower state and local governments.
  • Encourage technological solutions and promote innovation.
  • Reduce regulatory burdens on U.S. businesses.
  • Streamline and cut federal government red tape to expedite transportation projects.

These principles are laced with code phrases. In conservative orthodoxy, for instance, “the fundamental federal role” does not include spending on transit. Meanwhile, “empowering state and local governments” implies weakening federal oversight of highway-centric state DOTs — an area where U.S. DOT made progress during the Obama administration.

The document does contain one explicit reference to “inadequate” “public transit and rail transportation,” but otherwise the language is standard boilerplate that refers to accelerated highway construction. With Senate Democrats talking about making common cause with the White House on infrastructure spending, advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.

More recommended reading today: Urban Milwaukee teases out trends in rural economies that might have helped elect Trump in Wisconsin. And the Political Environment reports that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, facing fiscal pressures, has scaled back an unpopular highway widening in Milwaukee.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Opinion: Sean Duffy’s ‘Golden Age’ of Dangerous Streets

Ethan Andersen
December 15, 2025

‘I’m Always on the Bus’: How Transit Advocacy Helped Katie Wilson Become Seattle’s Next Mayor

December 12, 2025

Watchdog Wants Hochul To Nix Bus Lane Enforcement Freebies for MTA Drivers

December 11, 2025

More Truck Routes Are Coming To A Street Near You

December 11, 2025

Upstate County’s New Bus Service Will Turn A Transit Desert Into A Rural Network

December 11, 2025
See all posts