Skip to content

Transit-Oriented Development: Beyond the Big City

We're taking it out of the city and into the suburbs and small towns today on the Streetsblog Network. Member blog Urban City Architecture takes a look at Moving Communities Forward, a recently released report on transit-oriented development (TOD) from the American Institute of Architects and the Center for Transportation Studies at the University of Minnesota (it was funded by the Federal Highway Administration):

We’re taking it out of the city and into the suburbs and small towns today on the Streetsblog Network. Member blog Urban City Architecture takes a look at Moving Communities Forward, a recently released report on transit-oriented development (TOD) from the American Institute of Architects and the Center for Transportation Studies at the University of Minnesota (it was funded by the Federal Highway Administration):

1321716227_29873caf6b.jpgOutside the Fruitvale BART station, one of the projects cited in the “Moving Communities Forward” study. Photo by Payton Chung via Flickr.

What this study ultimately says is that Americans who live in small towns do not have to be afraid of environmental and transportation development initiatives. Small town/city life is an ideal fit with principles that encourage walkable pedestrian environment and connected communities with urban centers.  It was not many decades ago that small-town life resembled the transit-oriented developments that we are now attempting to recreate — small towns throughout America were dependent on connected and sustainable centers. One could even argue that many of the small towns and cities in America were in and of themselves transit-oriented developments — before the wide acceptance of the automobile, railroads and walkable developments where the lifeline of many of these towns.

Urban Review STL is on a road trip, visiting a mall outside Seattle to see what walkability might mean in a suburban retail environment. Bike PGH reports on Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell’s Sunday-talk show appearance, in which he said that merely reauthorizing the current transportation bill would be “a disaster for future generations. We have to change. We have to
do something like the infrastructure bank; creative, innovative,
visionary.” And at the Fast Lane, DOT secretary Ray LaHood continues to lay out an explanation of what “livable communities” mean to this administration.

Speaking of which, we really like a lot of what we’re reading on the DOT blog, but we kind of stumble on the name every time we have to type it. We’d like your suggestions for a new name that would reflect the shift in policy we seem to be seeing. Hit us with your ideas in the comments.

Photo of Sarah Goodyear
Sarah Goodyear is a journalist and author who has covered cities and transportation for publications such as Grist, CityLab, and Streetsblog.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Opinion: Sean Duffy’s ‘Golden Age’ of Dangerous Streets

Ethan Andersen
December 15, 2025

‘I’m Always on the Bus’: How Transit Advocacy Helped Katie Wilson Become Seattle’s Next Mayor

December 12, 2025

Watchdog Wants Hochul To Nix Bus Lane Enforcement Freebies for MTA Drivers

December 11, 2025

More Truck Routes Are Coming To A Street Near You

December 11, 2025

Upstate County’s New Bus Service Will Turn A Transit Desert Into A Rural Network

December 11, 2025
See all posts