Skip to content

DOT’s Missed Opportunity on the Manhattan Bridge

On Friday, Department of Transportation Commissioner Iris Weinshall stood up in front of 600 people at Borough President Stringer's Transportation Policy Conference and said that her agency was serious about reducing car use in New York City. It was a great policy speech.

On Friday, Department of Transportation Commissioner Iris Weinshall stood up in front of 600 people at Borough President Stringer’s Transportation Policy Conference and said that her agency was serious about reducing car use in New York City. It was a great policy speech.

Then on Sunday morning I flipped on the radio and heard that the lower roadway of the Manhattan Bridge would be closed for repairs for a year. Throughout the day on Sunday and then again this morning, the local media has faithfully repeated this message from the City:

The Department of Transportation is urging drivers to use alternate routes and roadways, even though the upper level of the bridge will remain open during construction.

Today’s message to area commuters would have been a great opportunity for the City to begin implementing the new policy direction that Weinshall put forward on Friday. In addition to urging drivers to use alternative routes and roadways, DOT should also be urging drivers to use the many alternative modes that are available to commuters crossing the East River—rail, buses, bicycles, ferries, and the under-utilized Brooklyn Battery Tunnel. Unfortunately, DOT is not seizing on this opportunity.

Is this nitpicking? I don’t think so. In the end, it is the moments like this that count far more than a big policy speech at Columbia University. Today, the city’s message on the Manhattan Bridge closure is being repeated ad nauseum throughout the region’s various news channels. DOT has the ear of the region’s commuters. The agency has the chance to let the region’s car commuters know, in a subtle, non-threatening and entirely helpful way, that with the Manhattan Bridge’s car-carrying capacity greatly reduced there are better ways to transport themselves into Manhattan than by car. So, why isn’t DOT doing that?

It is one thing to make a great policy speech. It is a far different thing to implement policy. A policy speech doesn’t mean that much if the content of that speech doesn’t filter down into the day-to-day culture, communications and operations of city government. Commissioner Weinshall needs to make that happen.

Photo: GoCarlo

Photo of Aaron Naparstek
Aaron Naparstek is the founder and former editor-in-chief of Streetsblog. Based in Brooklyn, New York, Naparstek's journalism, advocacy and community organizing work has been instrumental in growing the bicycle network, removing motor vehicles from parks, and developing new public plazas, car-free streets and life-saving traffic-calming measures across all five boroughs. He was also one of the original cast members of the "War on Cars" podcast. You can find more of his work on his website.

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Opinion: Sean Duffy’s ‘Golden Age’ of Dangerous Streets

Ethan Andersen
December 15, 2025

‘I’m Always on the Bus’: How Transit Advocacy Helped Katie Wilson Become Seattle’s Next Mayor

December 12, 2025

Watchdog Wants Hochul To Nix Bus Lane Enforcement Freebies for MTA Drivers

December 11, 2025

More Truck Routes Are Coming To A Street Near You

December 11, 2025

Upstate County’s New Bus Service Will Turn A Transit Desert Into A Rural Network

December 11, 2025
See all posts